[Islam Amish]

Two young deadly strikers that play for AC Milan and Internazionale respectively.

Who is better, the Brazilian or the Italian?

[Bruno_Hott]

Pato for sure

More fast, more intelligent, more skillfull, more beautifull...auuhauaua

[ronaldo 97]

right now, i think they're on the same level. but pato is more professional... the only reason pato gets more playing time is cos we have milito, eto'o, pandev

[t a s s™]

Of Course Pato.
But Balotelli is gr8 too, his shoots is amazing, & his skills..

[Romanista.per.sempre]

Right now Pato is a much better player, more mature with better attitude and team work.

But, I think with time, Balotelli can become a better player than Pato in the future. His biggest advantage is his size and power, which can make a lot of difference in the modern game

[MrDonTug]

Anyone got any Hd quality Balotelli clips? Could be useful?
Thanks

[RafaelDaSilva]

definitly Pato.
He is much and much smarter than Balotelli.
Pato keeps his calm and doesn't make any stupid tackles like Balotelli does.
If you see Balotelli's body launguage you could say that he doesn't want to play but Pato is energetic and want to score goals and give assists.

[Keile]

I would probably say Pato, but only because he is older than Balotelli and has gifted with more g ame time. The latter actually has much more potential and I actually think is more skillful with the ball at rest as well. He has played games with defenders on the touchline and at the end of games.

This post has been edited by Keile: 12 March 2010 - 06:46 AM

[Jabberwock]

OK I think they're on par with each other but for the sake of discussion I'd opt for Balotelli. At least for now.

Yes his a dick. But an extremely talented one.

Pato is superior in his dribbling, pace, flair and overall professionalism, but Balo has this aura about him that just oozes class. Balo is also superior in his strength, balance, shooting, heading.

With that said though, Id rather have Pato on my team just for the fact that Balo never seems to put in any effort.

[Payno]

Balotelli for me too - I think he has definitely got an attitude problem, but I think he has the potential to go further than Pato.

I also think Pato was only hyped up because he was Brazilian - happens to most young brazilian players, whether it'd be unfortunate or not.

[Jabberwock]

Balotelli in Milan Jersey:




This kid, for all his talent, is immensely immature. I must say if this circus continues we'd just have to freeze him out for the rest of the season.

Balotelli - Pato swap anyone?

[Thant Zin]

In a few years times, after given more games and chances to prove himself, it will be Balotelli. But, this guy has one big issue ~ he has a serious attitude problem. Furthermore, he is a Black, which makes him easy target to pick by racist. Hence, this attitude. But I would not blame him either. As much as I respect Mourinho, he is no better than Balotelli in terms of attitude. Remember that Mourinho has a lot of enemies and is not very well liked by others except Chelsea fans, who still worship him.

Pato is the more experienced, mature and reliable of the two. Balotelli still shows a childish, rebellious streak.

Right now, Pato > Balotelli. But that could change in a few years time.

This post has been edited by Thant Zin: 28 March 2010 - 07:33 AM

[stinger]

If I was a manager i'd choose Pato. He's just not so selfish and arrogant. If Balotelli does't change his behavior on the pitch, he could finish somewhere in Russia or Turkey, no matter how skillful and fast he is. It's about attitude.

[razorgod]

Pato is good but Balotelli have better shooting power and good dribbling skills.....
but one thing Pato is a team Player..
so for me Pato edges Balotelli by just

[TAHA95]

Balotelli is an idiot. I mean he's really immature and out of his mind. No doubt he's got great skills and stuff but as a complete package Pato is much much better.

[t a s s™]

Pato, but Balotelli is good.
So sad that Dunga didn't choose Pato to his 23-man squad

[Bodinho]

My two favourite people ! They are both amazing! Balotelli will not reach his full potential with his current attitude though.

[Hydro2k10]

Pato

Balotelli hasn't even done anything yet.

Balotelli is a quality striker on fifa 10 manager mode though, he's one of the best young strikers on the game

[Bodinho]

Hydro2k10, on 05 July 2010 - 01:41 PM, said:

Pato

Balotelli hasn't even done anything yet.

Balotelli is a quality striker on fifa 10 manager mode though, he's one of the best young strikers on the game

What has Pato done that Balotelli hasn't this season? Balotelli won the Serie A, UEFA Champions League and Coppa Italia if i'm not mistaken?
Balotelli and Pato are good on FIFA 10! Balotelli is stronger which makes it easier to play with him. I think ability wise in real life they are both part of the next generation of potential world class forwards. But Balotelli must change his approach to football and how he portrays his life before he can progress. However it is important to consider that Balotelli had a very unstable childhood and it could still be affecting him now.

[Drogbacite94]

Pato is better but Balotelli is great too skillfull powerfull with great shooting precision but his behaviour is bad he needs to move to another club to learn dicipline and become one of the best players on the planet