I've only ever worn Nike, but I'm probably going to buy a pair of Adidas boots next time. Nike is flashy whereas Adidas seems just classy, putting more emphasis on quality. I don't know. So I want you all to give your opinions.

I've noticed a lot of players who were with Nike decided to change, why is this? Do they think Nike is no good? Totti, Vieira, Vieri, Riquelme, Crespo... they have all changed from Nike in the past. The list is much bigger, though I can't remember them all.

So which is better and why?

I would say adidas put more effort into comfort and performance than nike.But nike do design boots around looks.The only nike boot that dosnt seem to be on looks is legends

I had this dilema a few weeks ago when I was tring to decide which to go for. I couldn't decide between Nike Vapours or Adidas F50+

I tried them both on in shops and liked the look and feel of both so I did some research on forums and other review boards and finally went with Adidas, mainly because I'd had them before and were very comfy, well made and had a good alround feel to them when playing.

I'd heard that Nike's tend to cause more people blisters and the Vapours weren't very good in the wet. Also, Adidas have been making boots for years and seem to know what they are doing whereas when nike get involved with other sport equipment it never seems to last that long.

Just my opinion though.....

thanks for the useful info there guys.

Keep it coming.

I used to wear Nike, but I think Adidas are more classier and better looking boots. So I now wear Adidas.

i got f50+s i prefer adidas 2bh

adidas do more relible trainers for example preds they are the best trainer for football you could ask for big hard and thin at end just right for the ball top curl and lob nike do better looking designs like colthes and boots but break easy so do the footballs nike make so for style nike and for keeps adidas,hope this helped you mate